The present season of the BBC1 television programme, Great British Menu, slides along through its latest 15th season showcasing chefs who work mainly in London restaurants but who claim to represent (with pride of course) various regions of The United Kingdom by virtue of having been born there, or having been brought up there, or having attended college there, or having a second cousin-in-law three times removed who lives there and so on. Their pride in the region with which they have these various connections and which entitles them to represent those particular regions does not of course extend to them working there and boosting those various regions’ economies by contributing to the local food scene. The pit of London draws them in and those who were once ‘One eyes’ (according to that discerning critic Giles Coren) are transformed into great chefs by virtue of working in that grubby city and privileged BBC luvvies are able to consume their food at highly inflated London prices which a BBC salary paid for by the television license fee will easily cover. Having grazed there they will then go off and complain about the government’s approach to social inequality and deprivation.
But lo! The very first episode features a Brummie chef who actually works in Birmingham and struggles passionately to keep his restaurant afloat despite the slings and arrows of outrageous gastronomic fortune and whose dishes perhaps are rather (some of them at least) outrageous. As already revealed in Blog 87, I refer of course to the chef in The Wilderness, Alex Claridge.
The first episode kicked off with the shocking revelation that there were not three chefs representing the Central region this year but four which made for pretty heart-pounding television viewing, I’ll tell you. And also there was the added drama of them having to prepare an amuse bouche for the first time ever in the competition’s history, one’s pulse rate raced with the revelation. That amuse bouche might be more important than you think as it was stated that if there were a tie then the performance in the amuse bouche section would be decisive in deciding the winner. Golly! Never has so little meant so much to so few. Interestingly as the weeks have gone by, that pesky amuse bouche section has proved a great trouble for many of the chefs who seem to view it as a starter judging by the large amount of food they have put into their a.b.s one or two of which have been positively gargantuan.
The other shocking revelation at the start of episode one was that an extremely irritating Scottish comedienne was hosting the programme and hogging the cameras beyond tolerability. Although she ruined the Central region heats it seems that the producers have recognised the error they made in deciding to put her in the programme and, like Alice, she seems to be gradually disappearing as the series goes along. Which is good for my stress levels which rose with the irritation I experienced every time she appeared on screen and opened her mouth to make yet another fatuous remark. Now if only Radio 4’s Today programme could do the same and make Martha Kearney and Nick Robinson, especially Martha Kearney, disappear in the same way then balance will have been restored to my life and it will be far more easy to deal psychologically with the current pandemic.
But back to the amuse bouche. Alex Claridge’s bavette beef tartare with Parmesan custard, gherkin ketchup, crispy onion and pickled shallots was placed last by the mildly bumptious guest chef-judge, Paul Ainsworth, and you really couldn’t help getting the feeling that the result of the competition was already decided. Though it’s fair to say it did look rather more like a small starter than amuse bouche.
|
“I hope it won’t be me that skidaddles after the fish course” |
And so, on to the starter. The dishes this year are to be based on books for children hence marking, rather obtusely, the Bicentenary of the publication of Dickens’ Oliver Twist which, so the programme tells us, features the first child hero of a novel. Alex Claridge chose to base his starter on Roald Dahl’s Revolting Recipes which isn’t too promising a premise for a starter at a banquet. He named the dish Nah You’re Revolting. OK, that’s different. At this stage I began to have the feeling that we might be in for another extreme modern dish as was delivered by Kray Tredwell in the Midlands heats last year. And indeed we were though possibly one step beyond. The dish was centred on a ‘modern take on butter chicken’ rendered this time in the form of Norfolk quail marinated in a yogurt and spice mix making a butter chicken sauce and served with coal oil produced by using squid ink, a coconut and lemon grass gel and, instead of rice, roasted meal worms and crickets, which Alex Claridge promised would be “crunchy, salty and spicy”, and a spring onion and wood ant emulsion. Thus Claridge was opening up the new cuisine of insectivorous dining. A step too far for me I think. He foresaw great excitement among the children at the banquet but I have the feeling that there might have been a few plates sent back untouched. I’ve had ants at his restaurants before - impressively citric without a doubt but to be picked at with hesitation rather than joyfully swept up into one’s mouth - and crickets before (weirdly slotted into an otherwise very edible dessert) which I did not find at all pleasant but I would surely draw a line at the exquisitely unappetising mealworms whether or not they were crunchy and spicy.
|
The pleasures of insectivorism |
|
Meal worms, a vital ingredient of Nah! you’re revolting!
|
|
Discussing the starter |
|
The face of a comedienne who has just tasted a spring onion wood ant emulsion. |
The starter scored 6 out of 10. And it wasn’t because of the insects. Indeed not. Like any cool, up-to-the-moment, hip chef Ainsworth embraced the insects. “Alex,I like your theme. It’s controversial. Really like that you added locust bhaji. Best thing on the plate for me. The quail was cooked well and the butter chicken sauce really nice. The ants brought acidity and I thought it had a nice earthiness with those mealworms too. What I didn’t understand was the squid ink and coal oil. Too overpowering. Completely killed the dish. It’s good to embrace the brief, alright? but, in my experience, less is more”.
|
“Alex, I’m giving you 6 points” |
Oh well, there’s always the fish course at the end of which the lowest scoring chef will be sent home and not allowed to cook his/her remaining dishes.
Alex Claridge’s fish course was called
Goth Apple taken from a book by a Black Country writer, Susan Price and with a heavy Japanese element to it.
The dish was made up of wasabi emulsion, scallop slices cured in bonito vinegar with discs of mirin and pressed apple, crispy salmon skin, dashi vinegar-pickled cucumber balls, apple skin powder, dashi ponzu (made from soy, apple juice and mirin), and garnished with sea purslane and apple blossom and served with caviar and a white chocolate skull filled with apple ponzu. A remarkable sight on the plate but not perhaps quite as startling to those of us who have had the pleasure of meeting Alex Claridge’s chocolate skulls before (though never I think with the fish course).
Ainsworth awarded the dish 8 points while the 3 other chefs’ main courses all received 10 points. Claridge was going home. Ainsworth said, “Alex, your dish, Goth Apples, the white chocolate skulls, they were incredible, really inventive, loads of fun, fantastic. The scallops, they were the right choice of protein for that dish. For me though there was just one thing that’s all, it was that wasabi. It just overpowered everything else”.
I should have liked to see what Alex Claridge was planning to bring to the table as his main and dessert courses not to mention the “pre-pudding pudding” as the comedienne was constantly babbling about. Perhaps he will appear again next year. Ainsworth stated, after the points were delivered, “You have an unbelievable wild style and you know what? don’t change. You are an absolute talent”. Wild style? True but there’s a bit more than that to our local chef.
|
“Alex, I am scoring you 8” |
One final illustration:-
|
Irritating beyond imagination. |